Pro Fitness Ranking


	Contest Confidential FitSights Photos Pro Fitness Ranks Pro Figure Ranks Suit Scoop Links

	Home The Attic Attic Home Join Profiles Flex Files Competitions Coverage Eye of FitSights Blog Store Services Extras Contest Confidential FitSights Photos Pro Fitness Ranks Pro Figure Ranks Suit Scoop Links Contact E-Mail

FINAL 2005 IFBB FITNESS RANKINGS

#	Name	Intl	NY	Em	Eur	NC	Oly	Sac	Total
1	Tracey Greenwood	5		8	12	10	9		44
2	Julie Palmer	5	10			12	7	6	40
3	Kimberly Klein	11	12				13		36
3	Adela Garcia	13					11	12	36
5	Julie Childs		6	10			5	10	31
6	Tanji Johnson	5		12			5	8	30
6	Jen Hendershott	15					15		30
8	Mindi O'Brien	5	2		8	8	5		28
9	Angela Semsch		4	4	2	6	5	4	25
10	Debbie Czempinski	5	8				5		18
11	Stacy Simons				10		3		13
12	Amy Haddad			2	6	4			12
13	Kelly Ryan	9							9
14	Kim Lyons			6	2				8
15	Stacy Hylton	7							7
16	Amy Huber			2	2	2			6
16	Donna Jones				2	2		2	6
18	Sabrina Gibson			1	2	2			5
19	Sandie Ward		2		1			1	4
19	Sanda Wickham			1	1			2	4
19	Christina Summers			2				2	4
19	Kendra Elias				4				4
23	Shannon Dey			1	1	1			3
23	Stephanie Worsfold		2	1					3
23	Summer Montabone				1	2			3
23	Sally Wombwell					1		2	3
23	Kirsten Nicewarner	3							3
23	Carla Sanchez	3							3
29	Terri Mooney			2					2
29	Nicole Rollolazo			2					2
29	Marie Allegro		2						2
29	Kristina Henn		2						2
29	Karen Walcott				1	1			2
29	Katie Szep					2			2
29	Brittany Thorsch							2	2
36	Sandy Grant			1					1
36	Bridgette Newell			1					1
36	Elizabeth Maurice			1					1
36	Lea Waide			1					1
36	Rosi Mena			1					1
36	Kizzy Vaines					1			1
36	Ester Ovary							1	1

Weighting
Ms. I & Ms. O: Top 5: 15-13-11-9-7 | Top 6-10: 5 | All others: 3
All other pro events: Top 5: 12-10-8-6-4 | Top 6-10: 2 | All others: 1

Ranking is for entertainment purposes only.
FitSights fitness and figure competition scores are determined solely on the placings of the athletes in the competitons. While the judges may determine their scores on muscle shape and tone, proportion, definition, and muscle size, our scores are derived from the actual results of the judges tabulations. We also reward frequency of competition, because it is more difficult to come in lean and hard for 5 shows and do well, than 1 contest and do well.