Open source bodybuilding fed
In the computer world, there are two general models of operating systems.. the Windows model, which is run by the bigwigs in Redmond, WA, and the open source Linux model, which has the potential to be run by anyone with the passion to bring something to the table.
In Wikipedia's definition of open source, it references a 1997 book titled "The Cathedral and the Bazaar" by Eric Raymond, which compares the different approaches to building these types of structures and how they relate to the development of software. Although he doesn't make a direct comparison to Windows, the "traditional methodologies to building a cathedral were 'fully crafted by individual wizards or small bands of mages working in splendid isolation'."
The bazaar method employs different tactics, including frequent integration, high modularization, dynamic decision making structure and the concept that users should be treated as co-developers.
Now, why did I bring up this obscure allegory? Well, the fact that I'm a card carrying computer dork allows me to relate the development of software to a heated debate going on at the Muscle Mayhem message boards. The debate, which centers around the lack of documentation of by-laws within the non-profit federation, is a good — yet lengthy — read for those of you interested on what goes on behind the scenes in the NPC.


1 Comments:
i think the window, linux thing is amazing. i prefer linux, but use windows for easy of use. the book sound interesting, i think that money has a lot to do with it, but software used to be completely open souce, even before the internet. and in the past it was cool. Now it hard to "get at the machine" because there is so much software inthe way.
the approach you were talking about is kind of like thw waterfall model in software development, the wizards, but software development nowadays is much more "bitty", spiral software development or a process call agile software development, which is truer to really life. The thing about the cathederal was that people knew how the building would behave, It was a stationary object, with mechanics there. But software is totally different.
Post a Comment
<< Home